Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Comparative Efficiency Evaluation of Different Clay Pots Versus Bucket Irrigation System Under Swiss Chard (Beta vulgaris subsp. cicla) Growers Condition in Northern Ethiopia

A. Araya, Lucieta Guerreiro Martorano, Atkilt Girma, Solomon Habtu, Haile Kebede, Kiros Meles Hadgu


Rain-fed agriculture shares the largest crop production system in Tigray region. However, due to erratic nature of rainfall, crop production is always at a risk. For this reason crop production in the arid and semi arid regions of northern Ethiopia usually requires supplemental irrigation. In an effort to assist agricultural production under smallholder farmers, the Regional Bureau of Agriculture and Natural Resources has been looking for efficient and less costly irrigation methods. Although drip irrigation technology has been well known for its higher efficiency, its adoption was too slow due to its high initial cost and inadequate technical knowhow.  At the moment, in some areas of Tigray farmers have started practicing locally made low cost clay pot irrigation technology. However, the water use efficiency and its economic viability under smallholder farmers were not adequately understood. The objectives of this study were thus to examine the economical viability and estimate the water use efficiency of clay pot irrigation technology and to evaluate the performance of different clay pot design for irrigating Swiss chard (the most common leafy vegetable crop in this region). In this research traditional pot maker was instructed to manufacture four different clay pot designs (imperforated bar type, imperforated round shape type, perforated bar type and perforated round types) which were used for assessing performance of clay pot for irrigating swiss chard. Performance tests were carried out based on economic and biomass water use efficiencies and cost benefit ratios under two groups of farmers (with and without land). The result showed that the imperforated bar shaped clay pots were found to be suited to grow Swiss chard. The water seeps out through the micro pores of the clay pots with relatively slow leaks and long surface wetting time and large area converge around the roots of plants. Contrarly, perforated clay pots leak the water fast through the macro and micro pores and have relatively short wetting time and small area coverage. On the other hand, the difference between imperforated bar and round types were simply the shapes of the pots which is to do with the area coverage along with the rows of the Swiss chard plant. Round types were not as suitable as bar type of the same capacity for row Swiss chard crops due to their small wetting area coverage compared to a similar volume with imperforated bar shaped clay pots type. The economic and biomass water use efficiency for the imperforated bar clay pot design was higher than that of the bucket irrigation system as well as other tested clay pots. The other advantages with imperforated bar clay pots over the bucket type is that the water source is inside the soil thus evaporation is almost nil and there is also less probability of occurrence of leaf disease due to watering and ultimately improving the biomass and economical water use efficiency. However, the technology was not as profitable as the bucket irrigation technique when considering the benefit-cost ratio (BCR) due to costs incurred for purchase of clay pots.





Climate change adaptation, Clay pot irrigation, Swiss chard, Water use efficiency

Full Text:



Abu-Zreig, M. M., and Atoum M. F., 2004. Hydraulic characteristics and seepage modeling of clay pitchers produced in Jordan. Canadian biosyst. eng. 46.

Araya, A., and Stroosnijder, L., 2011. Assesing drought risk and irrigation need in northern Ethiopia. Agroc. For. Meteorol., 151, 425 – 436

Araya, A., Keesstra, S. D. and Stroosnijder, L., 2010. A new agro-climatic classification for crop suitability zoning in northern semi-arid Ethiopia. Agric. For. Meteorol. 150, 1047-1064.

Ashrafi, S., Gupta, A., Singh, M.B. , Izumi, N. , Loof, R., 2002. “Simulation of Infiltration from Porous Clay Pipe in Subsurface Irrigation”.Hydrol. Sci. J. 47(2), 253 268.

Bainbridge, D.A., 2001. Buried clay-pot irrigation: little-known but very efficient traditional method of irrigation, Agricultural water Management 48(2), 79-88.

Batchelor, C., Christopher, L., Murata, M.,1996. “Simple Micro-irrigation Techniques for Improving Irrigation Efficiency on Vegetable Gardens”.Agricultural Water Management. 32, 37-48.

Daka, A.E., 2001. Chapter 7 Clay pot sub-surface irrigation as water-saving technology for small-farmer irrigation in Development of technological package for sustainable use of Dambos by small-scale farmers, PhD Thesis, University of Pretoria, South Africa.

Goudie, A., 2006. Global Warming and Fluvial Geomorphology. Geomorphology. 79, 3-4, 384-394

Hegazi, S.M., 1998. “Subsurface Irrigation Method using Porous Clay Pipe”. Progress Report, Iranian Agricultural Education and Research Institute, Agricultural Research and Education Organization, Ministry of Agriculture, Iran.

Okalebo, J.A., Home, P.G., Lenga, F.K., 1995. Pitcher irrigation: a new irrigation technique to curb the effects of Stalinization. In: Proceedings of the 7th Conference of the society of Agricultural Engineers on Engineering the Economy, Jomo Kenyatta University of Agriculture and Technology, Nairobi, Kenya, 15-21.

Power, G. 1985. “Porous Pot Help Crop to Grow in North Eastern Brazil”.World Water. July, 21-23.

Raihana B. 2012. Trend in Productivity research in Bangladesh Agriculture: A Review of selected Articles. Asian Business Review, 1, 1-4.

Sheikh, M.I. and B.H. Shah. 1983. “Establishment of Vegetation with Pitcher Irrigation”. Pakistan J. For. 33(2):75-81.

Siyal, A. A., and Skaggs, T. H., 2009. Measured and simulated soil wetting patterns under porous clay pipe sub-surface irrigation. Agric. Water Manag. 96, 893–904

Tesfaye, T., Tesfaye, K., and Woldetsadik, K., 2011. Clay Pot Irrigation for Tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill) Production in the North East Semiarid Region of Ethiopia. J. Agr. Rural Develop. Trop. Subtrop. 112 – 1, 11–18

Wolde-Georgis , T., 2010. Testing the use of clay pots sub-surface irrigation methods for dry land farming in Atsebes, Ethiopia, Progress Report to the directors of Conservation, Food & Health Foundation. Consortium for Capacity Building, Univ.of Colorado, Boulder.

Ziervogel, Gina, Anthony Nyong, Balgis Osman, Cecilia Conde, Sergio Cortés, and Tom Downing, 2006. Climate Variability and Change: Implications for Household Food Security, AIACC Working Paper No. 20 January.

-- 0 --


  • There are currently no refbacks.

Copyright (c) 2016 A. Araya, Lucieta Guerreiro Martorano, Atkilt Girma, Solomon Habtu, Haile Kebede, Kiros Meles Hadgu

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.