Occupational Exposure to Ionizing Radiation in Interventional Cardiology Practices in Bangladesh during 2010-2014
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18034/mjmbr.v3i2.407Keywords:
Interventional Cardiology, Ionizing Radiation, Occupational Health, TLD, Dose limitAbstract
Objective: The objective of this study is to assess, analyze and discuss the occupational exposure to ionizing radiation in interventional cardiology practices in Bangladesh for the last 5-year periods.
Method: Each year, about 100 workers working in interventional cardiology departments of big hospitals in Dhaka City were monitored using Harshaw Thermoluminescent Dosimeters (TLDs) for quarterly basis. The effective dose of the occupational workers were measured using Two Harshaw TLD Readers (one is manual TLD reader, model-4500, and another is automatic TLD reader, model 6600 plus).
Finding: The average annual effective dose (about 80 % workers) in interventional cardiology practices were <2mSv in 2010-2014 and no monitored workers were found to have received an occupational exposure >50 mSv in a single year or >100 mSv in a 5 year period. The status and trends in occupational exposure demonstrate that radiation protection conditions at the majority of the workplace were adequate. Despite that, further optimization is necessary due to large variations observed in the maximum individual doses over the 5-year periods.
Metrics
Downloads
References
Basic, B., Beganovic, A., Samek, D., Skopljak-Beganovic, A. and Gazdic –Santic, M. (2010), “Ten years of monitoring the occupational radiation exposure in Bosnia and Herzegovina”, Radiat. Prot. Dosim., Vol. 139 (1-3), pp 400-402. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/rpd/ncq006
Beganovic, A., Kulic, M., Spuzic, M., Gazdic-Santic, M., Skopljak-Beganovic, A., Drljevic, A., Dzanic, S., Basic, B. and Lincender, L. (2010), “Patient doses in interventional cardiology in Bosnia and Herzegovina: first result”, Radiat. Prot. Dosim., Vol. 139 (1-3), pp 254-257. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/rpd/ncq085
Ciraj-Bjelac, O., Rehani, M.M., Sim, K.H., Liew, H.B., Vano, E. and Kleiman, N.J.(2010), “Risk for radiation-induced cataract for staff in interventional cardiology: is there reason for concern?”, Catheter. Cardiovasc. Interv., Vol. 76(6), pp 826-834. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ccd.22670
Harshaw TLD Model 6600 Plus Automatic TLD reader user manual (2007). Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc., Available on http://www.kortec.cz/files/thermo/TLDModel6600.pdf.
International Atomic Energy Agency (1999). Assessment of occupational exposures due to external sources of radiation. Safety Guides Series No. RS-G-1.3.
International Atomic Energy Agency (2014). Radiation Protection and Safety of Radiation Sources: International Basic Safety Standards. General Safety Requirements Part-3.
International Commission on Radiological Protection (1997). General Principles for the radiation protection of workers, First ed. Annals of the ICRP 27 (1) Pergamon. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0146-6453(97)88275-9
International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP) (2007). The 2007 Recommendations of International Commission on Radiological Protection. ICRP Publication 103. Ann. Of ICRP 37 (2- 4) Elsevier.
Jacob, S., Michel, M., Spaulding, C., Boveda, S., Bar, O., Brezin, A.P., Streho, M., Maccia, C., Scanff, P., Laurier, D. and Bernier, M. (2010), “Occupational cataracts and lens opacities in interventional cardiology (O’CLOC study): are X-rays involved?”, BMC Public Health, Vol. 10, pp 537. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-10-537
United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation (2000). Report to the General Assembly. United Nations, New York, USA.
Vano, E., Gonzalez, L., Beneytez, F. and Moreno, F.(1998), “Lens injuries induced by occupational exposure in non-optimized interventional radiology laboratories”, Br. J Radiol., Vol. 71, pp 728-733. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1259/bjr.71.847.9771383
Vano, E., Gonzalez, L., Guibelalde, E., Fernandez, J.M. and Ten, J.I. (1998), “Radiation exposure to medical staff in interventional and cardiac radiology”, Br. J Radiol., Vol. 71, pp 954-960. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1259/bjr.71.849.10195011
-- 0 --
