Assessment of Eucalyptus Globulus Coppice Yield in the Highland Areas of North Shewa, Ethiopia

Authors

  • Lemma Habteyohannes Woldeamanual Debre Birhan Agricultural Research Center
  • Getabalew Teshome Reta Debre Birhan Agricultural Research Center
  • Melese Bekele Nigussie Debre Birhan Agricultural Research Center
  • Reta Eshetu Tsedeke Debre Birhan Agricultural Research Center
  • Hailemariam Fiseha Zenebe Debre Birhan Agricultural Research Center
  • Damtew Ababu Wudineh Debre Birhan Agricultural Research Center

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18034/mjmbr.v7i2.497

Keywords:

Eucalyptus globulus, coppice levels, plantation, yield, shoots, stump

Abstract

One of the old traditional methods of silvicultural management is coppicing. Many woody species produce new shoots successfully after coppicing. Regeneration of forest through coppice can be used for short rotation of tree to produce wood biomass for construction and fuel purposes. There are different levels of coppice practiced in Eucalyptus globulus plantation in the highland areas of North Shewa. However, there was no evidence or study which coppice levels can give high yield. Therefore, the objective of this study was to compare yield of E. globulus at different coppice level in the highland areas of North Shewa, Ethiopia. Fifty sampled plots were purposively selected for this study. Volume, mean annual increment, stump height and diameter, stem number and harvesting age were determined from sampled plots. The results revealed that there was no yield difference (p> 0.05) between zero, first, second and third coppice levels. However, stump diameter and number of shoots per stump, stump height were significantly different among 1, 2, 3 coppice levels (p<0.05). Number of shoots were positively correlated with stump diameter and height (r = 0.77, r = 0.72) respectively. Farmers mostly coppice E.globulus from November to December and from April to June. Although statistically there was no yield difference between coppice levels, as farmers described the first coppice has higher yield than other coppice levels. The numbers of shoots per stump were higher in the second and third coppice and this could affect stem quality especially at early stage. Altogether the mean number of stems per hectare was 10812 which is higher than previous studies. Therefore, early silvicultural activities like thinning, early coppice management and pruning has to be done to increase wood stem quality and to promote growth as well.

 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

  • Lemma Habteyohannes Woldeamanual, Debre Birhan Agricultural Research Center

    Debre Birhan Agricultural Research Center, Debre Birhan. P.O. Box, 112, ETHIOPIA

  • Getabalew Teshome Reta, Debre Birhan Agricultural Research Center

    Debre Birhan Agricultural Research Center, Debre Birhan. P.O. Box, 112, ETHIOPIA

  • Melese Bekele Nigussie, Debre Birhan Agricultural Research Center

    Debre Birhan Agricultural Research Center, Debre Birhan. P.O. Box, 112, ETHIOPIA

  • Reta Eshetu Tsedeke, Debre Birhan Agricultural Research Center

    Debre Birhan Agricultural Research Center, Debre Birhan. P.O. Box, 112, ETHIOPIA

  • Hailemariam Fiseha Zenebe, Debre Birhan Agricultural Research Center

    Debre Birhan Agricultural Research Center, Debre Birhan. P.O. Box, 112, ETHIOPIA

  • Damtew Ababu Wudineh, Debre Birhan Agricultural Research Center

    Debre Birhan Agricultural Research Center, Debre Birhan. P.O. Box, 112, ETHIOPIA

References

Abiro Tigabie, Abie Legesse, Yeshimebet Chanyalew, Tsegaye Getacheew (2016). A participatory Agricultural Production System Analysis: Implication for Research and Development for North Shewa Zone. AGP-II Program Survey. Debre Birhan Agricultural Research Center. (Unpublished internal report).

Abiyu, A. (2016). Proceedings of the 8th Annual Conference on Completed Research Activities of Forest Research.

Albaugh, T. J., R. A. Rubilar, C. A. Maier, E. A. Acuña and R. L. Cook (2017). Biomass and nutrient mass of Acacia dealbata and Eucalyptus globulus bioenergy plantations. Biomass and Bioenergy 97: 162-171.

Asmamaw, M., A. Ambelu and S. T. Mereta (2018). Climate Resilience Index as a tool to explore households' resilience to climate change-induced shocks in Dinki watershed, central highlands of Ethiopia. bioRxiv: 382358.

Blake, T. (1983). Coppice systems for short-rotation intensive forestry: the influence of cultural, seasonal and plant factors. Australian Forest Research 13(3/4): 279-291.

Coppen, J. J. (2003). Eucalyptus: the genus Eucalyptus, CRC Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1201/9780203219430

Dessie, G. (2011). Eucalyptus in East Africa: socio-economic and environmental issues, International Water Management Institute.

Eldridge K, Davidson J, Harwood C, Wyk G (1993). Eucalyptus domestication and breeding. Clarendon, Oxford. pp. 60–71.

Geldres, E., J. Schlatter and A. Marcoleta (2004).Coppice options for three Eucalyptus species, a case in the Osorno Province, X Region. Bosque 25(3): 57-62.

Greyer, W.A. Naughton, G.G. &Melicar, N.N. (1985).Biomass gains in coppicing trees for energy crops Proceedings for biomass third European Commission conference, Venice, Italy; March 25-29, 1985. London and New York, Elsevier Applied Science Publishers.

Guzmán, G., M. Morales, T. Pukkala and S. de Miguel (2012). A model for predicting the growth of Eucalyptus globulus seedling stands in Bolivia. Forest systems (2): 205-209.

Hailu, Z. (2002). Ecological impact evaluation of Eucalyptus plantations in comparison with agricultural and grazing land-use types in the highlands of Ethiopia.

Jacovelli, P. A. (2003). Cultivation and production of eucalypts in Africa. Eucalyptus: The Genus Eucalyptus: 216.

Kalu, D. and A. Seid (2014). Ethnobotanical study of nedicinal plants in Ankober woreda, central Ethiopia. Ethiopian Journal of Science and Technology 7(2): 105-114.

Karwani, G. M., L. Lulandala, A. Kimaro and Z. Msigwa (2016).The role of short rotation coppice technology in fuel wood supply in Rung we district, Tanzania. International Journal of Agricultural Research, Innovation and Technology 6 (1): 41-46.

Kirby, K. and C. Watkins (2015). Europe's changing woods and forests: from wildwood to managed landscapes, CABI. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1079/9781780643373.0000

Little, K. M. and R. A. Gardner (2003).Coppicing ability of 20 Eucalyptus species grown at two high-altitude sites in South Africa. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 33(2): 181-189.

Luostarinen, K., N. Huotari and E. Tillman-Sutela (2009).Effect of regeneration method on growth, wood density and fibre properties of downy birch (BetulapubescensEhrh.).

Lust, N. and M. Mohammady (1973). Regeneration of coppice, ForschungszentrumfürWaldbau. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21825/sg.v39i0.980

Matthews, J. D. (1991). Silvicultural systems, Oxford University Press.

Mengist, M. (2011). Eucalypts plantations in the highlands of Ethiopia revisited: A comparison of soil nutrient status after the first coppicing. Mountain Forestry Master Programme.

Pohjonen, V. and T. Pukkala (1990).Eucalyptus globulus in Ethiopian forestry. Forest Ecology and Management 36(1): 19-31.

Pohjonen, V. and T. Pukkala (1991). Which eucalypt grows best in Ethiopian highlands? Biomass and Bioenergy 1(4): 193-198. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0961-9534(91)90002-T

R Core Team (2017). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria.URL https://www.R-project.org/.

Rinehart, J. A. and R. B. Standiford (1983). Growth and yield in Eucalyptus globulus. In: Standiford, Richard B; Ledig, F Thomas, technical coordinators. Proceedings of a work-shop on Eucalyptus in California, June 14-16, 1983, Sacramento, California. Gen. Tech. Rep. PSW 69. Berkeley, CA: Pacific Southwest Forest and Range Experiment Station, Forest Service, US Department of Agriculture; p. 61-68 69.

Shackleton, C. M. (2000). Stump size and the number of coppice shoots for selected savanna tree species. South African Journal of Botany 66(2): 124-127.

Songyuan, Y. Z. X. D. J. (2001). The Effect of Stump Diameter on Sprout Regeneration in Eucalyptus Urophylla[J]. Forestry Science and Technology 4: 001.

Spinelli, R., N. Magagnotti and J. Schweier (2017).Trends and Perspectives in Coppice Harvesting. Croatian Journal of Forest Engineering: Journal for Theory and Application of Forestry Engineering 38(2): 219-230.

Stape JL, Madachi JC, Bacacicci DD, Oliveira MS. (1993). Eucalyptus spp sprout management: technical and operational results. Circular Técnica IPEF, 183: 1–13.

Steinbeck, K. (1981). Short-Roation Forestry as a Biomass Source an overview. In: Palz, W. Chartier, P., Hall, D.D, (Eds.), Proceedings of first European Biomass Conference. Energy from biomass. Applied Science Publishers, pp.163-171.

Tolosana, E., L. Gil, W. Tadesse and R. López (2010). Eucalyptus Species Management, History, Status, and Trends in Ethiopia, Ethiopian Institute of Agricultural Research (EAiR).

Turnbull, J. and L. Pryor (1978).Choice of species and seed sources. In. Hillis WE, Brown AG (eds). Eucalyptus for wood production, CSIRO, Canberra.

Whittock, S. P., B. L. Greaves and L. A. Apiolaza (2004). A cash flow model to compare coppice and genetically improved seedling options for Eucalyptus globulus pulpwood plantations. Forest Ecology and Management 191(1-3): 267-274.

Wingfield, M. J., Slippers, B., Hurley, B. P., Coutinho, T. A., Wingfield, B. D., & Roux, J. (2008). Eucalypt pests and diseases: growing threats to plantation productivity. Southern Forests: a Journal of Forest Science, 70(2), 139-144. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2989/SOUTH.FOR.2008.70.2.9.537

Zewdie, M. (2008). Temporal changes of biomass production, soil properties and ground flora in Eucalyptus globulus plantations in the central highlands of Ethiopia.

--0--

Published

2020-08-03

Issue

Section

Peer-reviewed Article

How to Cite

Woldeamanual, L. H. ., Reta, G. T. ., Nigussie, M. B. ., Tsedeke, R. E. ., Zenebe, H. F. ., & Wudineh, D. A. . (2020). Assessment of Eucalyptus Globulus Coppice Yield in the Highland Areas of North Shewa, Ethiopia. Malaysian Journal of Medical and Biological Research, 7(2), 93-100. https://doi.org/10.18034/mjmbr.v7i2.497