The Economics of Deposit-Refund Systems: Exploring the Market-Based Environmental Policies to Sustain the Ecological Balance of Dhaka City
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18034/apjee.v3i2.233Keywords:
Plastic Bottles, Environmental Hazards, Deposit-Refund System, Container-deposit legislation, DhakaAbstract
Bangladesh was not familiar with the uses of plastics as containers a few decades ago. However, in recent years, particularly its large cities like Dhaka have experienced a widespread and growing use of plastic products that posits the threat to pollute the environment as well as creates health hazards and hinders sustainable development. Furthermore, the unscrupulous traders who refill thousands of empty plastic bottles with unclean tap water make the situation worse. The country needs some adequate steps to restore and sustain the ecological balance and before taking any initiative it is imperative to explore the measures that the developed countries have employed to manage their plastic bottle disposals effectively. The Container-deposit legislation (CDL) is a widely used initiative that entails a series of financial refund on smooth-drink, juice, milk, water, alcohol-beverage, and other reusable packaging at the point of sale. When the bottle or container is returned to an authorized redemption center, or to the unique vendor in a few jurisdictions, the deposit is partly or fully refunded to the redeemer, presumed to be the unique purchaser. The study explores different schemes that the North American countries, European and the Scandinavian Nations have adopted, identifies the problems they faced, analyzes the present condition of Dhaka city and attempts to explain how and why the legislation need to be implemented in Bangladesh.
Downloads
References
Ackerman, F. D., Cavander, J. S. &Zukerman, B. (1995), Preliminary Analysis: The Costs and Benefits of Bottle Bills. U.S. EPA Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response. Draft Report. Boston: Tellus Institute.
Alavaikko, M., & Österberg, E. (2000), The influence of economic interests on alcohol control policy: a case study from Finland. Addiction, 95(12s4), 565-579.
Barett,J. T. (2015), The Advantages of Plastic Bottles, Demand Media, Seattle Pi. Retrieved 22 October 2015.URL: http://education.seattlepi.com/advantages-plastic-bottles-4834.html
Calcott, P and Walls, Margaret. (2000), Can Downstream Waste Disposal Policies Encourage Upstream "Design for Environment"? The American Economic Review, Vol. 90, No. 2, 233- 237.
Cantner, J., Gerstmayr, B., Pitschke, T., Tronecker, D., Hartleitner, B., & Kreibe, S. (2010), Bewertung der Verpackungsverordnung–Evaluierung der Pfandpflicht. Umweltbundesamt-Texte, 20, 1-228.
Chandler, A. J., Eighmy, T. T., Hjelmar, O., Kosson, D. S., Sawell, S. E., Vehlow, J. & Hartlén, J. (1997),Municipal solid waste incinerator residues. Elsevier.
Clay, Joy A. (1989), The DC Bottle Bill initiative: a casualty of the Reagan era. Environmental Review.13 (2). Summer, 17-31.
Coutts, I. (2010), Brew North: How Canadians Made Beer and Beer Made Canada. Greystone Books Ltd.
Demographia (2015), Demographia World Urban Areas (11th ed.). Retrieved 21 September 2015. URL: http://www.demographia.com/db-worldua.pdf
Eik, Arne, and Andreas Brekke. (2003) "Interactive product development in recycling systems–A case study of the Norwegian deposit system for PET bottles." Paper presentated at the Industrial management and purchase (IMP) group conference in Lugano, Switzerland
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). (2001), “The United States Experience with Economic Incentives for Protecting the Environment”. 57-66. EPA-240-R-01-001.The National Center for Environmental Economics (NCEE).
Fullerton, D., & Wolverton, A. (1997), The case for a two-part instrument: presumptive tax and environmental subsidy (No. w5993). National Bureau of Economic Research.
General Accounting Office (GAO). (1990), Solid Waste: Trade-offs Involved in Beverage Container Deposit Legislation. Report #GAO/RCED-91-25. Washington, D.C.
Haq , Naimul (2015)Brisk business of fake bottled water on, Published in The Daily Star, on April 2, 2015, Retrieved on Novermber 05, 2015, URL: http://archive.thedailystar.net/2005/04/02/d5040201117.htm
Jørgensen, F. A. (2011) Making a Green Machine: The Infrastructure of Beverage Container Recycling. Rutgers University Press.
Kolstad, Charles D. (2000), “Environmental Economics”. 200-202. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
McCarthy, James E. (1993), Bottle Bills and Curbside Recycling: Are They Compatible? Congressional Research Service.January.
Norrman, J., & Soori, S. (2014), Plastic Debris on Shores: An Evaluation of Collecting and Recycling Possibilities in Fiji.
Pearce, David and Turner, R. Kerry. (1992), Market-Based Approaches to Solid Waste Management. 22-29. CSERGE Working Paper WM 92-02.
Porter, R. (1983), "Michigan's experience with mandatory deposits on beverage containers." Land Economics 59:177-194.
Sjolander, Richard and Chen, Henry C.K. (1989), The macromarketing effects of Beverage Container Legislation. 24-34. Journal of Macromarkleting.Spring, 24-34.
Stavins, Robert N. (1998), Market-Based Environmental Policies.Discussion Paper 98-26.14-18. Resources for the Future.
Tilley, Kate (2015), Australia moving closer to nationwide container deposit law, Plustic News, Retrieved on 5th November, 2015, URL http://www.plasticsnews.com/article/20150528/NEWS/150529924/australia-moving-closer-to-nationwide-container-deposit-law
Tojo, N. (2011), Deposit Refund Systems in Sweden. IIIEE Reports.
Wellman Inc. (1994), PET Recycling Supply/Demand Analysis.
-- 0 --