The Object-Oriented Database Management System versus the Relational Database Management System: A Comparison

Authors

  • Mounika Mandapuram Cognizant Technology Solutions, Teaneck, New Jersey, USA
  • Md. Faruk Hosen Department in accounting, Nandina Sheikh Anwar Hossain College, Jamalpur, BANGLADESH

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18034/gdeb.v7i2.657

Keywords:

OODBMS, RDBMS, Contrast, Involvedness, Legacy

Abstract

Both object-oriented and relational database management systems are referred to as DBMS. The web-scale is expanding at an incredible rate, and with it comes an increase in mobile applications, technologies, and social media platforms. The rapid growth of these technologies produces a variety of structured and unstructured data in various forms, each of which has various consequences for data security. Using RDBMS and OODBMS, this study's methodology outlines the development, installation, and management process of multiple and complicated data sets. This study gives a documented study comparing different kinds of data stored in databases by employing two types of database techniques: relational database method and object-oriented database technique. We use a different fingerprint database for the web and mobile devices. This database is also managed using different technologies, such as MySQL, and it accommodates data generated using distinct methods. In addition, this study explores the benefits and advantages of the various databases and determines the ideal database management system for organizations. According to the survey's findings, RDBMS stores data and the relationships between them in tables, but OODBMS stores data in objects, in a manner analogous to Object-Oriented Programming (OOP). According to the study's findings, the primary distinction between relational database management systems (RDBMS) and object-oriented database management systems (OODBMS) is that RDBMS is a Database Management System based on the relational model. In contrast, OODBMS is a Database Management System that facilitates creating and modeling data as objects.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

De, P., Sinha, A. P., & Vessey, I. (2001). An empirical investigation of factors influencing object-oriented database querying, Information Technology and Management, 2(1), 71–93.

Dietrich, S., & Urban, S. (2010). Fundamentals of object databases: Object-oriented and object-relational design, Springer International Publishing AG.

Leitheiser, R. L., & March, S. T. (1996). The influence of database structure representation on database system learning and use: JMIS. Journal of Management Information Systems, 12(4), 187.

Leitheiser, R. L., & March, S. T. (1996). The influence of database structure representation on database system learning and use: JMIS. Journal of Management Information Systems, 12(4), 187.

Lungu, I., Velicanu, M., & Botha, I. (2009). Database Systems - Present and Future. Informatica Economica, 13(1), 84-99.

Ma, Z. (Ed.). (2004). Advances in fuzzy object-oriented databases: Modeling and applications. Idea Group, Inc.

Mandapuram, M. (2016). Applications of Blockchain and Distributed Ledger Technology (DLT) in Commercial Settings. Asian Accounting and Auditing Advancement, 7(1), 50–57. Retrieved from https://4ajournal.com/article/view/76

Mandapuram, M. (2017a). Security Risk Analysis of the Internet of Things: An Early Cautionary Scan. ABC Research Alert, 5(3), 49–55. https://doi.org/10.18034/ra.v5i3.650

Mandapuram, M. (2017b). Application of Artificial Intelligence in Contemporary Business: An Analysis for Content Management System Optimization. Asian Business Review, 7(3), 117–122. https://doi.org/10.18034/abr.v7i3.650

Purao, S., Jain, H. K., & Nazareth, D. L. (2002). An approach to the distribution of object-oriented applications in loosely coupled networks: JMIS. Journal of Management Information Systems, 18(3), 195–234.

Thuraisingham, B., Sandhu, R., & Ting, T. C. (Eds.). (1994). Security for object-oriented systems: Proceedings of the OOPSLA-93 conference workshop on security for object-oriented systems, Washington dc, USA, 26 September 1993. Springer London, Limited.

Ya-Hui, C., & Raschid, L. (2000). Producing Interoperable Queries for Relational and Object-Oriented Databases. Journal of Intelligent Information Systems, 14(1), 51.

Downloads

Published

2018-12-31

Issue

Vol. 7 No. 2 (2018): July - December Issue

Section

Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2018 Mounika Mandapuram, Md. Faruk Hosen

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

The CC BY-NC 4.0 license lets others remix, tweak, and build upon your work non-commercially, and although their new works must also acknowledge & be non-commercial, they don’t have to license their derivative works on the same terms.
|| View License Deed ||
|| View Legal Code ||
 
Publishing paper with Global Disclosure in Economics and Business means that the author or authors retain the copyright in the paper.
This journal is granted an exclusive noncommercial reuse license by the author(s), but the author(s) are able to put the paper onto a website, distribute it to colleagues, give it to students, use it in your thesis, etc, so long as the use is not directed at commercial advantage or toward private monetary gain.
The author(s) can reuse the figures and tables and other information contained in their paper published by Global Disclosure in Economics and Business in future papers or work without having to ask anyone for permission, provided that the figures, tables or other information that is included in the new paper or work properly references the published paper as the source of the figures, tables or other information, and the new paper or work is not direct at private monetary gain or commercial advantage.

How to Cite

Mandapuram, M., & Hosen, M. F. (2018). The Object-Oriented Database Management System versus the Relational Database Management System: A Comparison. Global Disclosure of Economics and Business, 7(2), 89-96. https://doi.org/10.18034/gdeb.v7i2.657
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC