A Comparative Study on the Preference for Delivery Process in Bangladesh
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18034/abcjar.v3i1.28Keywords:
Caesarean section, Bangladesh, natural birth, factors, delivery process, pregnant womenAbstract
The purpose of this study is to assess the current situation about caesarean births and natural births in Bangladesh. This study along with an objective of presenting the comparative analysis also examines the factors that influence women to take decision about their delivery. Statistical analyses based on face to face interviews with 110 pregnant women from government and private institution were performed to find out the dominant factors affecting women to choose their delivery process. Both bivariate analysis and binary logistic regression were used to identify the influential socioeconomic factors. This study attempted to seek out the factors that are responsible for women to take their decisions regarding the delivery process. The variables named living place, occupation, economic condition, education level and institution were found to be most significant.
Downloads
References
A.Mehta, Apers, L., Verstraelen, H., & Temmerman, M. (n.d.). Trends in caesarean section rates at a maternity hospital in Mumbai, India.
Akanda, M. A. (2011). Demand for Institutional Delivery in Bangladesh: An Application of Household Production Function. Dhaka University Journal of Science.
Banu, M., & Nasreen, H. E. (2011). Factors influencing the performance of delivery centres in urban slums of Bangladesh: A qualitative research. OIDA International Journal of Sustainable Development.
Davudsdttir, R. (2012). Anthropology of Childbirth-cross cultural approach.
Gibbons, L., Lauer, J. A., Belizan, J. M., Betran, A. P., Merialdi, M., & Althabe, F. (2010). The Global Numbers and Costs of Additionally Needed and Unnecessary Caesarean Sections Performed per Year:Overuse as a Barrier to Universal Coverage. World Health Report (2010).
Kamal, S. M. (2013). Preference for Institutional Delivery and Caesarean Sections in Bangladesh.
Karim, M. R. (n.d.). Inappropriateness in Health Treatments and its Impact on economy: The Case of Caesarean Delivery in Bangladesh.
Khan, M. M., & Islam, M. S. (n.d.). Collaborate public service delivery in Bangladesh: Does it really boost all- inclusive development?
Lowdon, G., & Derrick, D. C. (2002). Caesarean section or vaginal birth? What difference does it make? AIMS Journal, Spring 2002, Vol 14 No 1
Main, E., Hopkins, D., & Melsop, K. (2011). Cesarean Deliveries, Outcomes, and opportunities for change in California: Toward a Public Agenda for Maternity Care Safety and Quality.
Nazneen, R., Begum, R., & Sultana, K. (2011). Rising Trend of Caesarean Section in a Tertiary Hospital Over a Decade.
Sarker, B. K., Higgins, J., Mridha, M. K., Ferdous, J., Dasgupta, S. K., Ahmed, S., et al. (2012). Caesarean Delivery in Urban Slums of Dhaka City:Indications and consequences. Manoshi Working Paper Series.
Subedi, S. (n.d.). RISING RATE OF CESAREAN SECTION – A YEAR REVIEW
Sufang, G., Padmadas, S. S., Fengmin, Z., Brown, J. J., & Stones, R. W. (n.d.). Delivery settings and caesarean section rates in China.
--0--
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2014 Tahsin Farzana Jisun, Md. Rasel Kabir
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
