How has GIRFEC Affected Multi-Agency Working in the Assessment Process?
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18034/ajhal.v5i2.336Keywords:
GIRFEC, Multi-Agency Working, Team DevelopmentAbstract
GIRFEC approach was carried out in this research in order to test the effectiveness, durability and strength along with its shortcomings, which works for the betterment of children and youth of Scotland (Government of Scotland, 2015). The study carried out by the author is to understand the interpretation and calculations of the multiple agencies that work for this cause.The existences of these agencies is not a new thing in Scottish environment and with the participation of parents and these agencies, the researcher found that for many years now, working of the agencies together in order to support team work had been encouraged. As the collaboration of the parents and multiple agencies has its perks and showed better results over the years, there were many researches that showed that in some agencies, they lacked team work and they were not compatible and because of that it resulted into deaths of many children across the UK (Hammond et al., 2010; Laming, 2003; Lord, 2009, Department for Education, 2010). Researcher in the current study focal point revolved around the idea of how the agencies carried out their investigations and if it had shown any better results for the parents and their children.
Downloads
References
Aritzeta, A., Swailes, S. and Senior, B., 2007. Belbin's team role model: Development, validity and applications for team building. Journal of Management Studies, 44(1), pp.96-118. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2007.00666.x
Department for Eduction. (2010) Haringey Local Safeguarding Children Board Serious Case Review ‘Child A’, Department for Education.
Hammond, E., McKinnon, E. and Nolan, D., 2010. Human Immunodeficiency Virus Treatment—Induced Adipose Tissue Pathology and Lipoatrophy: Prevalence and Metabolic Consequences. Clinical Infectious Diseases, 51(5), pp.591-599. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/655765
Honey, P. & Mumford, A. (1986) The Manual of Learning Styles. Maidenhead, Peter Honey.
Honey, P., 2001. Honey and Mumford learning styles questionnaire. Peter Honey Learning. Retrieved April, 25, p.2007.
Laming, L. (2003) Inquiry into the death of Victoria Climbié, London, Stationery Office.
Lord, L. (2009) The Protection of Children in England: A progress report, London, The Stationery Office.
Prichard, J.S. and Stanton, N.A., 1999. Testing Belbin's team role theory of effective groups. Journal of Management Development, 18(8), pp.652-665. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/02621719910371164
Scottish Government. (2015) Children’s Hearings [Online] Available at: http://www.gov.scot/Topics/People/Young-People/protecting/childrens-hearings. (Accessed 07/06/2015).
Scottish Government. (2015)Children and Young People (Scotland) Act 2014: The Scottish Government response to the consultation on the draft statutory guidance parts 4, 5 & 18 (Section 96), Scottish Government, Edinburgh.
Van Zwanenberg, N., Wilkinson, L.J. and Anderson, A., 2000. Felder and Silverman's Index of Learning Styles and Honey and Mumford's Learning Styles Questionnaire: how do they compare and do they predict academic performance?. Educational Psychology, 20(3), pp.365-380. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/713663743
--0--
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
How to Cite
