Anthropology an Intellectual Tradition and Contemporary Relevance
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18034/abcjar.v1i1.5Keywords:
anthropology, intellectual enquiry, dialectics, globalizationAbstract
The notion of invariable human nature has been an important subject of enquiry and continues even in the modern times. The relative malleability has been argued in recent centuries by the early mechanists Thomas Hobbes and Jean Jaques Rousseau. As Rousseau stated “We do not know what our nature permits us to be” thinkers like Hegel and Marx argued against invariable human nature. Still more recent scientific perspective such as behaviorism, modern psychology claims to be neutral in this regard. To them human’s origin posses underlying mechanism, having capacities for change and diversity, which ultimately is a violation of the classical philosophical anthropology. The resulting fragmentation, as a consequence, has impacted intellectual enquiry. It is pertinent to say that the new dialectics of change fail to comprehend ethics and moral values, which are associated with higher aim, realization of good life, politics implied to reach agreements on better conditions, and realization of rationality (which engages in enquiry to realize the common good), thereby jeopardizing place of humanity in the cosmos. The new global forces have made people powerless, reduced them to a cog in the environment of uncertainty, ultimately leading to a looming war of all against all that is inexorably destroying the conditions for life. The policies and characteristics of the modern state and their bureaucracies rather accelerate these sequences which may lead to eradication of humanity. In this paper we try to resolve issues of legacy, along with the new dialectical patterns of globalization.
Metrics
Downloads
References
An excerpt from the editors, introduction to thier1994, reader,culture,power and history, Nicholas B. Dirks, Goeffeley, and Sherry B. Ortner,eds.pp 3,4.
Arran gare ,p.4
Arran gare,p.3
Arran gare,p.6
Arran Gare,p.9
Arrangare, philosophical anthropology, ethics and political philosophy in an age of impending catastrophe,; cosmos and history; the journal of natural and social philosophy,volume5,no 2,2009.spage .3
Charles,,L.Harper and BryanF.LeBeau, social change and religion in America. Thinking Beyond Secularization,http;//are.as.wvu.edu/sochange.pp.10.11.
Clifford Geertz’s the impact of the concept of culture on the concept of man, which was reprinted in his influential collection, the interpretation of a culture. It neatly sets a mid-20thcentury view of culture in opposition to the typical enlighten view that the superficial diversity of culture masks an underlying- and readily discovered—universal uniformity.
David Marjoribanks,Marxism and Ethics, review,p.1
Garth Kimberling’s insightful discussion of Socrates, great philosophers; Socrates 111.p.1
George R.Geiger, Philosophy and social change.v.1no1 spring1941, p.2
George R.Geiger, the Atioch review vol-50, No ½ 50th anniversary p.21.
GeorgeR.Geiger,Philosophy and social change,volume 1,number,1,spring 1941,p.17
Great philosophers, Socrates, 111,p.1
Hegel’s ethics, overview of ethics. contribution to discussion march 2001,p.1
Historical theory and social change in John Dewey’s philosophy byHenryW.Hodysh,p.1
Human nature from Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia, page.1.
Ibid ,p. 1
ibid ,p.1 .
ibid ,p.2
ibid ,p.6
Ibid ,p.8
ibid ,Plato’s views on human nature,p.1
Ibid, p,7
ibid, p.11.
ibid, p.3
ibid, p.7.
ibid, p.9
ibid, p9.
ibid,p,p.5,6
ibid,p. 13
Ibid,p.1
ibid,p.1
ibid,p.1
ibid,p.2
Ibid,p.3.
ibid,p.8
Ibid,p.8.
ibid,p.9. ,
Ibid,pp,17,18
ibid,pp.15,17.
ibid.p.9
ibidp.2
IUAES AAS ASAANZ Conference 2011, Waltor jaros abstract from his paper, entitled, ‘one human race—universal human identity and global citizen ship as foundation for social co-opration and progress; horizon institute for, health promotion and global learning.
My paper, entitled, Thomas Hobbes, the 21st century philosopher, written on his centenary celebrations published in European Studies.
On human nature, using allegory of the cave as reference, yahoo contributers, 2887759.html.p..1.
Overview of Hegelian Ethics;a contribution to discussion march 2001;http;//home.mira.net/andy/works/overeth.htm.,p.2
Paul blackledge, international socialism, Marxism and ethics,issue,120,p.2
Paul .Ashton on Hegel,.s ethics,p.3.httpethical politics,orgseminarsasthetic.htm.
Paul Blackledge, international socialism, Marxism and ethics. http://www.isj.org.uk/ id=486.p
Paul Blackledge,p5.
Paul Blacledge,International socialism;Marxism and Ethics.Freedom,desire,and Revolution,state university of Newyork,Albany,2012.p.5
Peri Roberts and Peter Sutch: An introduction to Political thought , Aconteporal Tool Kit. Edinburgh university press,p.75
Plato, apology, 38 a .
Plato’s ethics, an over view, Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy, p.16. Plato’s views 24
Plato’s ethics, an over views tan ford encyclopedia of philosophy, p. 2,3.
Plato’s ethics; an over view, Stanford, encyclopedia of philosophy,p.2
Scot Erb, reading revolutions; great minds, great thoughts, Machiavelli and power politics,p.3
Social change and religion in America,p11
Socrates, Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy ,p.9
Sydel Silverman,s forward, to a major new book on the cultures concept; cited from culture, definitions, histories and discussions,p.10.
Thomas hobbes,leviathan,introduction,p.1
--0--
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
