A Pedagogical Perspective: An Exploration into Feedback and Group Work
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18034/abcjar.v10i1.546Keywords:
Pedagogy, Group Work, Exploration Feedback, Deeper ExplorationAbstract
There is a large body of education literature that discusses group work and feedback in a pedagogical sense. This is predominantly a consequence of a high percent of the literature being substantially social constructivist driven. However, there is still a significant need for research in this area due to a) the ever-changing 21st century and b) the amount of unanswered questions for teachers and practitioners, such as: How does an educator assign group tasks that encourage involvement, independence, a fair share of labor and in line with the curriculum? This short paper explored feedback and group work in a secondary setting using the author’s teaching experience as reference points throughout. More specifically, the paper highlighted strategies such as Kagan have become very popular in mainstream education over the last 5 years. Upon evaluating Kagan strategies, it was discovered that there was a need for pre-teaching of the strategies for pupils.
Metrics
Downloads
References
Bandura, A. (2006). Guide for constructing self-efficacy scales, In F. Pajares & T. Urdan (Eds.), Self-efficacy beliefs of adolescents, pp. 307-337 Connecticut: Information Age.
Black, P., & William, D. (1998). Assessment and Classroom Learning. Assessment in Education, 5(1), 7-74. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0969595980050102
Brown, S., Kirkpatrick, M., Mangum, M., Avery, J (2009). A Review of Narrative Pedagogy Strategies to Transform Traditional Nursing Education. Journal of Nursing Education, 47(6), 283-286. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3928/01484834-20080601-01
Bruning, R., Schraw, J., Norby, M., and Ronning, R. (2004). Cognitive Psychology and Instruction (4th ed.) Columbus, OH: Merrill.
Chaiklin, S. (2003). The zone of proximal development in Vygotsky’s theory of learning and school instruction. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511840975.004
Christopher, J. (2016). Group feedback in the classroom promotes home energy conservation. College of Natural Resources, 5, 4-88.
Costa, P., Terracciano, A., McCrae, R. (2001). Gender differences in personality traits across cultures: robust and surprising findings. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81(2), 322-331. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.81.2.322
Ellsworth, E. (1989a). Why Doesn't This Feel Empowering? Working Through the Repressive Myths of Critical Pedagogy. Harvard Educational Review 59(3) pp. 297-325. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.59.3.058342114k266250
Ellsworth, E. (1989b). Teaching Positions: Difference, Pedagogy, and the Power of Address. New York: Teachers College Press.
Feingold, A. (1993). Cognitive gender differences: A developmental perspective. Sex Roles: A Journal of Research, 29(1-2), 91-112. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00289998
Ferguson, C. (2013). It’s time for the nursing profession to leverage social media. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 69, 745–747. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.12036
Gielen, S., Tops, L., Dochy, F., Onghena, P., Smeets, S. (2010). A comparative study of peer and teacher feedback and of various peer feedback forms in a secondary school writing curriculum. British Educational Research Journal, 36(1), 143-162. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01411920902894070
Giroux, H. (2017). Pedagogy, Civil Rights, and the Project of Insurrectional Democracy. Howard Journal of Communications, 28(2), 203-206. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10646175.2017.1287610
Giroux, H., & Shannon, P. (2013). Education and Cultural Studies: Towards a Performative Practice. London: Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203949238
Gray, E., Tall, D. (1994). Duality, ambiguity, and flexibility: a ‘proceptual’ view of simple Arithmetic. Edu, 25(2), 116–140. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/749505
Harris, P. (1983) Infant cognition: Handbook of child psychology: Infancy and developmental psychobiology (2) New York: Wiley.
Hoffman, R., & Mercer, N. (2016). Teacher interventions in small group work in secondary mathematics and science lessons. Language and Education, 30(5), 400-416. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09500782.2015.1125363
Hramiak, A., & Boutlon, H. (2011). Exploring student and tutor perceptions of feedback in Post Graduate study. Society for Research in Higher Education, 1-3.
Hramiak, A., & Hudson, T. (Eds), (2011). Understanding Learning & Teaching in Secondary Schools. Harlow: Pearson Education Limited.
Jigang, C. (2011). A contrastive study of online peer feedback and online teacher feedback on Chinese college students' English writing. The Chinese Journal, 2, pp.319.
Johnson, D., Johnson, R., Smith, K. (2014). Cooperative learning: Improving university instruction by basing practice on validated theory. Journal on Excellence in College Teaching, 25(3&4), 85-118.
Johnson, W., Johnson, T. (1999). Learning Together and Alone: Cooperative, Competitive, and Individualistic Learning (5th ed.). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
Kagan, S. (1989). The structural approach to cooperative learning. Educational Leadership, 12, 12-15.
Kagan, S. (1994). Cooperative Learning. California: Kagan Publishing.
Komarraju, M., & Nadler, D (2013). Self-efficacy and academic achievement: Why do implicit beliefs, goals, and effort regulation matter? Learning and Individual Differences, 25, 67-72 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2013.01.005
Ladwig, J., Smith, M., Gore. J., Amosa, W., Griffiths, T. (2007). Quality of pedagogy and student achievement: multi-level replication of authentic pedagogy. Australian Association for Research in Education, 1-15.
Li, M., & Lam, B. (2013). Cooperative Learning. The Hong Kong Institute of Education, pp.1-33.
Lourenço, O., & Machado, A. (1996). In defense of Piaget's theory: A reply to 10 common criticisms. Psychological Review, 103(1), 143–164. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.103.1.143 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.103.1.143
Lui, C. H., & Matthews, R. (2005). ‘Vygotsky’s philosophy: Constructivism and its criticisms examined. International Educational Journal, 6(3), 386-399.
Lusted, D. (1986). Why Pedagogy? Screen, 27(5), 2-16. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/screen/27.5.2
MacGilchrist, B., Myers, K., Reed, J. (1997). The Intelligent School. London: Paul Chapman Publishing
Marzano, J. (2003). What works in schools. Alexandria. VA: ASCD.
Murphy, C., Scantlebury, K., Milne, C. (2015). Using Vygotsky’s zone of proximal development to propose and test an explanatory model for conceptualising co-teaching in pre-service science teacher education. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 43(4), 281-295. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1359866X.2015.1060291
Myers, L., Faunce, E., Doutt, K., Dunbar, D., Parsons, J., Moy, E., Sheety, A. (2016). University Partnerships for Academic Program and Professional Development: Building Faculty Capacity for 21st Century Teaching and Learning. Emerald Group Publishing Limited, 221 – 241.
Nelson, R., Johnson, A. (1996). Effects of direct instruction, cooperative learning, and independent learning practices on the classroom behaviour of students with behavioural disorders: A comparative analysis. Journal of Emotional & Behavioural Disorders, 4, 53-63. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/106342669600400106
O’Brian, M., Munro, S., Payton, J (2006). Common Ground: Teaching Kids the Benefits of Working Together. Edutopia, 10(1).
O'Sullivan, L., Seabra, N. (2006). School in a Box in Low Resource Primary School in Mozambique: Practical Application of Zone of Proximal Development in Teacher Training with Mobile Technology. International Journal of Mobile and Blended Learning, 8(2), 1-13.
Pomerantz, E., Alterman, E., Saxon, J. (2002). Girls and boys experience academic difficulties very differently. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94(2), 396-404. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.94.2.396
Prater, A., Bruhl, S., Serna, A. (1998). Acquiring social skills through cooperative learning and teacherdirected instruction. Remedial and Special Education, 19, 160-172. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/074193259801900304
Reed, Z. (2014). Collaborative Learning in the Classroom. Center for Faculty Excellence, 1-6.
Reynolds, M. (1994). Group Work in Education and Training. London: Routledge.
Slavin, R. E. (1996). Research on cooperative learning and achievement: What we know. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 21(1), 43-69. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1996.0004
Sweet, M., Michaelson, L. (2010). Team based learning in the Social Sciences and Humanities. Virginia: Stylus Publishing.
Weiten, W. (1992) Psychology: themes and variations (2nd edn). California: Brooks/Cole Publishing Company.
--0--
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
